I will flag PNP stream gaps in your Canada PR file

A PNP nomination that does not match your occupation, residence plan, or prior IRCC history can stall a permanent residence file before forms are even assembled. I start with that mismatch risk: stream fit, nomination logic, and whether your evidence actually supports the pathway you intend.

PNP buyers search by stream fit, provincial nomination, Express Entry linkage, and evidence of work, education, ties, or job-offer facts. I make the stream-level assumptions and evidence gaps visible instead of treating every provincial pathway as interchangeable.

You send a one-paragraph goal, citizenship and status for each person, confirmation you are targeting Canada and where you will file from, hard deadlines, prior filings or refusals (full PDFs), passport biographic pages, education and language results if taken, employment letters, and family composition. I compare those facts to a Canada PNP permanent residence matter and PE filing posture.

What you receive depends on the tier you buy. Basic includes an eligibility checklist and a next-step roadmap. Standard adds a strategy memo, document and evidence review, and a filing roadmap, with two revision rounds. Premium is end-to-end package prep support, priority turnaround, extended Q&A, and three revision rounds. Across tiers I note what is strong, what is thin, and what still must be gathered. H&C or inadmissibility issues are addressed only as PR-adjacent strategy when your facts raise them.

This listing fits people comparing or sequencing a provincial nominee route into PR who need a lawyer review of questionnaire answers and key evidence. It is a poor fit if you want a guaranteed outcome, anonymous templates, or court or hearing counsel without a separate retainer. Government fees, medicals, biometrics, translations, and litigation sit outside this package.

I am Chera-Lee Gomez, a Canadian immigration lawyer licensed in Prince Edward Island. Work stays inside the purchased scope. No IRCC result is promised.