I will write your Canada DLI study permit filing plan

You get a clearer Canada study-permit filing plan: what evidence belongs with a designated-learning-institution admission, what is thin, and what to gather next. I work from your offer letter, intended proof-of-funds path, passport biographics, chronology, and any study-plan draft you already have.

Canada study-permit buyers search around DLI admission, study purpose, funding, ties, prior refusals, and whether the evidence supports the application story. I use those exact buyer questions when they are relevant to your file.

I am Meghan Felt, a Canadian immigration lawyer licensed in Newfoundland and Labrador (LL.B., University of New Brunswick, 2010; B.A., Memorial University, 2006). Consult context may be in English or French; filing-facing wording stays aligned to what IRCC expects. This package is attorney review and written strategy for study-permit posture, including related visitor-entry issues only when they sit in the same facts you upload.

What you receive depends on the tier you buy. Basic (delivered in 5 days, one revision) includes an eligibility checklist and a next-step roadmap. Standard (7 days, two revisions) adds a strategy memo and review of your questionnaire, key forms, and evidence. Premium (14 days, three revisions) extends package-prep support, priority turnaround, and extra Q&A. Government fees, medicals, biometrics, certified translations, and court or hearing work stay outside this listing unless we open a separate engagement.

This fit students and families organizing admission, funds, and filing posture from or to Canada. It is a poor fit if you only want a guaranteed outcome, anonymous templates, or litigation counsel. Start by sending your goal paragraph, citizenships and current status, where you will file from, hard deadlines, prior refusals or fairness letters, passport scans, the admission or enrolment letter, and the funds path you intend to use. I will say what is strong, what is missing, and how I would sequence the file—without inventing documents or promising IRCC results.