I will flag filing risks in your Canada IRCC packet

A second look is meant to catch what a rushed packet often misses: thin evidence, inconsistent forms, and facts that sit poorly against a prior refusal, RFE, procedural fairness letter, or removal history. I review the file you actually have, not a generic template, and I write what is strong, what is thin, and what still needs to be gathered before you file in Canada.

People buying a second look usually want one thing made explicit: what could go wrong in the file before IRCC sees it. I therefore focus on internal inconsistencies, weak evidence, prior-refusal or procedural-fairness history where relevant, and a written list of risks and next actions.

You receive limited-scope attorney review of your goal, status facts, deadlines, draft forms, and evidence table of contents. Depending on the tier you buy, that includes an eligibility checklist and next-step roadmap (Basic, 5-day delivery, 1 revision); a strategy memo plus document and evidence review (Standard, 7 days, 2 revisions); or end-to-end package-prep support with extended Q&A (Premium, 14 days, 3 revisions). Government fees, medicals, biometrics, translations, and court or hearing work stay outside this listing unless we open a separate engagement.

This fit is DIY filers and people who already had counsel and want an independent regulated read of the same packet. It is a poor fit if you only want a form fill, anonymous templates, or litigation without a new retainer. Upload the required intake: one-paragraph goal, nationality and current status for each person, confirmation you are targeting Canada and where you will file from, hard deadlines, full PDFs of prior filings or enforcement history, passport biographic pages, current draft forms, and a short note of what you want reviewed.

I practise as a Canadian immigration lawyer (NT licence). Findings are written from your facts and this package’s scope. I will not invent missing evidence or promise IRCC outcomes.