I will map your Canada inland sponsorship plan

Inland family sponsorship in Canada turns on who you are sponsoring, where you will file from, and whether your relationship and financial record are complete enough to submit. I work from your chronology, certificates, and labeled evidence index—not a blank template—and deliver a clearer filing plan, an evidence list, and written risk notes.

Canada sponsorship buyers repeatedly ask about spouse or partner eligibility, relationship evidence, family-class document gaps, and the order of IRCC steps. I use those concrete questions to structure the review rather than relying on generic sponsorship language.

You receive a consult scoped to family sponsorship: eligibility and pathway discussion for engaged or married couples, common-law partners, and family sponsors; strategy notes tied to Canada (including Québec posture where your facts require it); a document and evidence checklist; review of your questionnaire and key forms or proof at the depth of the tier you buy; and a written roadmap of next steps, thin spots, and filing posture. Basic includes an eligibility checklist and next-step roadmap. Standard adds a strategy memo, document and evidence review, a filing roadmap, and two revision rounds. Premium adds end-to-end package-prep support, priority turnaround, extended Q&A, and three revision rounds.

Upload your goal paragraph, nationality and status for each person, Canada destination and filing location, hard deadlines, prior filings or refusals (full PDFs), passport biographic pages, marriage or partnership certificate and any divorce decrees, a labeled relationship-evidence index, and sponsor financials as applicable. Optional translations, a preferred consult-language note, and specific questions help me focus the memo.

I am Martine Lefèvre, a CICC-regulated RCIC (registration on file). This is consultant work, not a lawyer opinion. Government fees, medicals, biometrics, translations, and court or hearing representation stay outside this package unless we open a separate engagement. I will not invent missing evidence or promise IRCC outcomes.