I will deliver written findings on your Canada petition

Your Canada immigration petition draft is the file I review. You receive written findings that mark what is strong, what is thin, and what still needs to be assembled before you file.

People buying a second look usually want one thing made explicit: what could go wrong in the file before IRCC sees it. I therefore focus on internal inconsistencies, weak evidence, prior-refusal or procedural-fairness history where relevant, and a written list of risks and next actions.

I work from your goal paragraph, nationality and current status for each person, where you will file from, hard deadlines, prior IRCC history (refusals, RFEs, procedural fairness, or removal records), passport scans, current draft forms, and an evidence table of contents. Optional items such as existing translations and a preference to discuss in French can be included. I do not invent translator credentials or missing proof.

Who this fits: DIY filers and people who already had counsel and want a regulated second look at eligibility, evidence gaps, and filing risk. It is not court representation, a full retainer for hearings, or a promise that IRCC will approve any application. Government fees, medicals, biometrics, and translations stay outside this package unless we open a separate engagement.

I am licensed in New Brunswick (J.D., Université de Moncton, 2016) and consult in English and French. Scope follows the tier you buy: Basic includes an eligibility checklist and next-step roadmap (5-day delivery, 1 revision). Standard adds a strategy memo and document/evidence review with a filing roadmap (7 days, 2 revisions). Premium is end-to-end package-prep support with extended Q&A (14 days, 3 revisions). After intake I review your facts against New Brunswick practice and this limited-scope review, then send written findings, a checklist, and recommended next actions. Use the revision window for clarifying follow-ups only.